Virginia Employment Commission • Administrative Review / Claims Review / Escalation / Benefit Payment Control

VEC Written-Record Evidence Matrix

Chronology showing notice, written compliance, portal instability, employer-liability clarification, and payment-restriction evidence
Claimant: Thomas Coates Claimant ID: 54377566 Issue ID: 26497093 Employer asserted: Cox

1. Main Issue & Procedural Position

Primary procedural point The evidence indicates that VEC possessed written information regarding Cox, TDI, portal instability, and the claimant’s response to the liable-employer inquiry. VEC nevertheless stated that the system blocked weekly certifications for identified benefit weeks pending additional fact finding. The central administrative question is therefore not whether the claimant selects the liable employer; VEC expressly states that it makes that determination. The question is whether VEC fairly processed the submitted information, provided a workable opportunity to respond, preserved blocked benefit weeks, and issued any required determination explaining the result.
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD INTEGRATION

The attached background record reflects that VEC’s review involved more than a simple claimant failure to identify an employer. VEC correspondence identifies a New Hire Verification process arising from TDI, LLC wage reporting; an Additional Claim (“ADD”) review; a DI-BPC Investigation; and a liable-employer review concerning whether Cox Communications would remain the liable employer or whether TDI, LLC would become liable.

VEC expressly stated that the Commission—not the claimant—determines the liable employer. VEC also stated that the system would not allow weekly certifications for the benefit weeks ending May 16, 2026 and May 23, 2026 until required fact finding was completed. The claimant had previously submitted written clarification, reported portal instability, and requested written handling of claim matters.

This matrix does not assert that the claimant chooses the liable employer or that VEC’s review was automatically improper. Rather, it identifies a fact-specific administrative question: whether VEC received, documented, and considered the claimant’s written responses; preserved the blocked benefit weeks; issued required notices and determinations; and accurately reconciled the respective Cox and TDI employment chronologies before restricting filing access or withholding benefits.

Main issue
Portal restriction / liable employer
Key framework
Employer Liable: Cox
Payment evidence
3 weeks / $1,092 asserted
Portal problem
Logout / display instability
Requested administrative outcome: Remove the payment-blocking restriction and process benefits after reconciling the existing employer and claim records.
Integration note: The supplemental entries above are incorporated as supplied by the user. They should be matched to the underlying VEC emails, notices, portal observations, and claim-file records before being used as authenticated evidence.

2. Entity Notice / Jurisdiction / Response Status Register

VEC Entity / UnitJurisdiction / FunctionNotice Given ByDate NotifiedDays Since NoticeResponse StatusEvidence / Administrative Significance
VEC AppealsCommission-level appellate / review channelConfirmed fax to +1 804-786-849205/20/20262 daysFax delivered; response not yet shownVEC-001 — Formal notice delivered; supports escalation record, preservation of filing rights, and review-level notice.
Adjudication WestAdjudication / wage and employer-liability reviewEmail response to Deatra / VEC788005/20/20262 daysResponse pending or not yet reflected in portal correctionVEC-002 — Direct notice to the unit that raised claim-processing instructions; supports record correction and reconciliation.
Customer Advocate / Escalation ReviewEscalation-level claim reviewPrior escalation email from Bonnie05/14/20268 daysResponse received; issue stated as reviewed/resolvedVEC-003 — Confirms claim was engaged at escalation level before the later restriction remained active or reappeared.
Benefit Payment ControlPayment hold / benefit release / possible overpayment reviewWritten employer-liability clarification05/20/20262 daysResponse pending; portal still shows payment delay issueVEC-007 / VEC-008 — Directly relevant to payment delay, benefit release, and record reconciliation where $0.00 overpayment is shown.
VEC Customer Contact / Technical SupportPortal access, CSS instability, technical compliance barriersFaxed technical difficulty report05/20/20262 daysResponse not shown in current recordVEC-006 / VEC-015 — Notice that portal instability affects filing access and reliability of online submissions.
VEC CSS Portal / Claim SystemClaimant-facing filing and issue-display systemScreenshot evidence of portal restriction05/21/20261 dayRestriction still displayedVEC-008 / VEC-014 — System continued to display liable-employer block despite written clarification and prior Cox payment history.
ADA / Accommodation RecordWritten communication and access accommodationPrior written accommodation materialsPrior to May 2026Previously noticedWritten communication need preservedVEC-016 — Supports request that VEC stop requiring phone-only resolution where written handling is available and already functioning.
Adjudication West — Prior Wage ReviewHistorical Cox wage / payroll clarificationPrior written submission with payroll materials10/07/2025227 daysAlready in VEC recordVEC-018 — Shows Cox employer and wage chronology were disclosed long before Issue ID 26497093.
VEC Automated Correspondence SystemClaimant notification and portal-direction systemAutomated notices from noreply@vec.virginia.gov2026 noticesOngoingPortal notices receivedVEC-017 — Demonstrates repeated direction back to the online system despite reported instability and display failures.
Claims Review / Administrative Review PersonnelRecord reconciliation, coding review, claim-processing continuityClosed-loop written submissions and faxed matrix packet05/20/2026 onward2+ daysCorrection not yet reflected in portalVEC-005 / VEC-007 / VEC-014 — Review personnel have notice that existing records appear sufficient to identify Cox as liable employer and remove the restriction.

3. Master Evidence & Procedural Matrix

Record IDDateTimeSender / OriginAddressee / DestinationMethodSubject / TitleEvidence DetailLegal / Procedural Value
VEC-00105/20/202609:35:51 PM UTCThomas CoatesVEC AppealsFax: +1 804-786-8492Fax.Plus confirmed faxTwo pages delivered; 48-second duration; from +1 757-906-6910.Notice, receipt, delivery, chain-of-transmission.
VEC-00205/20/2026Evening / Gmail recordThomas CoatesAdjudication West — ATTN: Deatra / VEC7880Email responseUnemployment Claim for Thomas CoatesContinued written communication; Cox liability history; internal reconciliation request.Direct response to staff inquiry; preserves written record.
VEC-00305/14/202610:33 AMBonnie — Escalation SpecialistThomas CoatesEmail CCCEscalation ResponseVEC states it reviewed the claim issue and resolved the issue(s).Escalation review occurred before or during later portal restriction activity.
VEC-00405/12/2026Mail date shownVirginia Employment CommissionThomas CoatesNotice / attachmentNational New Hire VerificationReferences TDI date of 02/23/2026 and asks about claimed weeks and wages.Separate track from liable-employer/base-period issue.
VEC-00505/20/2026Submitted by faxThomas CoatesClaims Review / FLA / CLA / Adjudication / Escalation TeamsFaxed written packetClosed-Loop Employer Liability ClarificationRequests written handling, notes portal restriction, asserts claim processed under Cox.Shows VEC already had employer-identification information.
VEC-00605/20/2026Submitted by faxThomas CoatesVEC Customer Contact / Help DeskFaxed technical reportOngoing Portal Instability and Session FailuresDocuments logouts, unstable sessions, incomplete questionnaire display.Preserves challenge to portal-only reliance.
VEC-00705/20/2026Submitted by faxThomas CoatesBenefit Payment Control / Claims ReviewFaxed written responseIssue ID 26497093 — Liable Employer ClarificationIdentifies Cox Communications as employer associated with claim record.Goes directly to the issue shown in portal.
VEC-00805/21/2026Approx. 2:38 PM ETVEC CSS PortalClaimant displayPortal screenshotIssues Delaying Payment — Active payment-blocking portal restrictionDisplays: Claimant Failed to Provide name of Liable Employer; Effective Date: April 26, 2026; Overpayment Balance: $0.00.Shows restriction persists despite written clarification.
VEC-00901/13/202609:58 AMVEC CSS SystemClaim recordPortal activityFile Reopen / Additional ClaimClaim reactivation event; claim reopened before later liable-employer restriction appeared.VEC processed reactivation before asserting missing employer information.
VEC-01012/20/2025Benefit week endingVECThomas CoatesBenefit paymentPayable benefit issuancePaid $364 under Employer Liable: Cox.Reported VEC payment-history entry identifying Cox as liable employer; retain the original payment-distribution record to authenticate employer attribution and payment details.
VEC-01101/17/2026Benefit week endingVECThomas CoatesBenefit paymentPayable benefit issuancePaid $364 under Employer Liable: Cox.Second payment confirming same framework.
VEC-01201/24/2026Benefit week endingVECThomas CoatesBenefit paymentPayable benefit issuancePaid $364 under Employer Liable: Cox.Third payment confirming same framework; total $1,092 asserted.
VEC-01304/29/202612:59 PMVEC CSS SystemClaim recordPortal activityFile Reopen / Additional ClaimLater reactivation activity after inactive interval following late-January 2026 filing activity.Separates January payable weeks from later referenced chronology.
VEC-01405/21/2026Approx. 2:38 PM ETVEC Portal SystemClaimant displayScreenshot evidencePortal Restriction Still DisplayedPortal reflects liable-employer issue and additional information needed.High-impact evidence of continued restriction.
VEC-015Multiple datesMultiple sessionsThomas CoatesVEC technical / administrative recordWritten reports / claim noticesPortal Instability PatternRepeated logout, pixelation/rendering failures, interrupted sessions, incomplete portal fields.Supports written submission as safer than portal completion.
VEC-016Prior to May 2026Existing in VEC fileThomas CoatesVEC accommodation / administrative recordWritten ADA / accommodation materialsReasonable Accommodation / Written Communication NeedWritten accommodation information already provided regarding health and communication limitations.Supports request to avoid phone-only resolution.
VEC-0172026 noticesAutomated email timestampsnoreply@vec.virginia.govThomas CoatesAutomated emailClaimant Notifications / Rights & ResponsibilitiesVEC repeatedly directed claimant back to CSS portal for correspondence and required actions.Relevant because portal instability makes online-only compliance unreliable.
VEC-01810/07/2025Prior submissionThomas CoatesAdjudication WestWritten submission with attachmentsWage / Payroll Clarification — Historical Cox chronologyPrior Cox wage reporting and payroll classification materials submitted.Shows Cox chronology was already in VEC records before Issue ID 26497093.
VEC-01905/22/2026Heather, VEC Escalation SpecialistThomas CoatesEmailTwo issues holding potential paymentsVEC identified DI-BPC Investigation and RR—Failure to Provide Name of Liable Employer as issues holding potential payments; requested information concerning both Cox and TDI.Direct VEC notice of the specific payment-related issues and information requested.
VEC-02005/22/2026Heather, VEC Escalation SpecialistThomas CoatesEmailADD claim / Double Dip reviewVEC stated that further employment information could allow review of a “Double Dip” denial, completion of an ADD claim, review of New Hire Verification, and resolution of the liable-employer issue.Establishes VEC’s own description of the unresolved review process and the administrative actions it said remained necessary.
VEC-02105/26/2026Heather, VEC Escalation SpecialistThomas CoatesEmailLiable Employer / New Hire VerificationVEC stated that the Commission determines the liable employer; a new employer’s wage report triggers New Hire Verification; and further information would allow VEC to determine whether Cox remained liable or TDI became liable.Strong agency statement establishing that employer attribution was under VEC review, not claimant election.
VEC-02205/26/2026Heather, VEC Escalation SpecialistThomas CoatesEmailDeadline notice for Issues 26474595 and 26497093VEC directed the claimant to return TDI information and a New Hire Verification form by May 28, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., stating that failure to provide information would result in an appealable decision.Preserves the deadline, the agency’s stated consequence, and the potential appeal trigger.
VEC-02305/27/2026Heather, VEC Escalation SpecialistThomas CoatesEmailPortal restriction / required fact findingVEC stated that Issue 26497093 required a fact-finding questionnaire and that the system would not permit weekly certifications until it was completed; VEC specifically identified weeks ending May 16 and May 23, 2026.High-value evidence that VEC acknowledged a system restriction affecting filing access for identified benefit weeks.
VEC-02405/27/2026Heather, VEC Escalation SpecialistThomas CoatesEmailNew Hire review processVEC stated that TDI wage reporting automatically triggered New Hire Verification and that liability could shift to TDI or remain with the original filing employer after review.Confirms a genuine agency review process while preserving the need for a final written determination and week-specific employer allocation.
VEC-02505/26–05/28/2026Thomas CoatesHeather / VEC EscalationsEmailWritten responses on TDI, Cox, portal block, and deadlineClaimant supplied written information concerning Cox, TDI, the asserted lack of week overlap, portal access problems, and the request to preserve filing rights.Establishes that written responsive material was provided and should be located in the VEC claim file.
VEC-02605/28/2026Thomas CoatesHeather / VEC EscalationsDraft email / portal observationRequest for confirmation of filing restrictionClaimant documented that the hold remained active and requested confirmation whether VEC had received, associated, reviewed, and acted upon written submissions, and whether blocked weeks were preserved.Supports a request for system logs, claim notes, and a written answer regarding preservation of affected weeks.

4. High-Value Administrative Themes Derived From the Matrix

ThemeRecord Support
VEC, not the claimant, determines the liable employerVEC-021
The review involved Cox and TDI, New Hire Verification, an ADD claim, DI-BPC Investigation, and potential Double Dip reviewVEC-019 through VEC-024
VEC identified particular benefit weeks that were blocked from filingVEC-023
Claimant submitted written responsive material before and during the filing restrictionVEC-005, VEC-007, VEC-025
Portal instability and restricted filing access were documented contemporaneouslyVEC-006, VEC-015, VEC-023, VEC-026
The record requires a week-specific reconciliation rather than a conclusory employer-liability assertionVEC-010 through VEC-013, VEC-021 through VEC-024
VEC must identify the final determination, affected weeks, payment status, and employer allocationVEC-019 through VEC-026
The matrix is an index to primary records, not a substitute for VEC’s actual determination or payment ledgerEntire matrix

5. Preservation / Oversight-Facing Record Hooks

Notice • Receipt • Portal Reliability • Written Accommodation • Employer Liability • Payment Processing • Administrative Reconciliation • Jurisdictional Notice • Response Status

This matrix is designed to be attached to or incorporated into a VEC written submission to show that the claimant used multiple written channels, preserved transmission evidence, responded to the precise liable-employer issue, documented portal instability, identified which VEC units had notice, preserved the response status for each entity, and requested correction of a payment-blocking notation despite a $0.00 overpayment balance.

Source / Use Note

The matrix is an index and procedural map for VEC review personnel; it is not a substitute for the original record. The source document states that days-since-notice entries were calculated from a working reference date of May 22, 2026 and should be updated if the matrix is used on a later date.