SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENTIARY ADDENDUM

RE: Procedural Invalidity of “One-Year Expiration” Tactic & Ongoing VEC Defaults

Filed in Support of:

DOJ Complaint #536785-LFD | EEOC Ref: 12K-2025-00001

Complainant: Thomas D. Coates

Date: July 2025

I. Cascading Adverse Inference Triggers in the Present Case

This record reflects multiple adverse procedural and factual violations by the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC), each constituting an independent ground for remedial or injunctive relief:

Deputy Decision Based on Partial Benefit Error

– Deputy-level ruling issued while Cox’s improper wage data remained uncured.

Cascading Deputy Decisions Vacated by Commission-Level Ruling

– Commission-level appeal overturned multiple downstream decisions, establishing legal invalidity from inception.

Vacation of Overpayment Finding

– Original overpayment decision later found invalid, vacated formally, and reaffirmed by Commission.

Improper Reliance on Vacated Findings for Continued Denial

– Benefits withheld post-vacatur without cause.

Three Incidents of Unreasonable Delay in Adjudicating Deputy Decisions

– Delay from appeal to resolution violated statutory timeframes, foreclosing payment.

Constructive Nonpayment Despite Final Commission Reversal

– No benefits issued as of July 22, 2025, despite final order dated May 8, 2025.

Expiration Letter Weaponized as Procedural Pretext

– July 22, 2025 notice used to insinuate closure, though claim is substantively active and adjudicated.

VEC Failure to Update Claim System Post-Final Ruling

– Claimant system status remains outdated, reflecting denial after reversal.

Refusal to Release FOIA Documentation Related to Post-Decision Nonpayment

– Ongoing record suppression compounding procedural harm.

Cross-Agency Delay Coinciding with Federal Complaints (EEOC, DOJ)

– Temporal link suggests retaliatory stalling to obstruct relief.

II. Ten Appellate-Level Instances or Analogous Precedents Refuting the “One-Year Expiration” Pretext

Remand Where VEC Used Benefit Year Expiration to Bar Legitimate Claims

o   Virginia Court of Appeals required full due process regardless of benefit-year expiration.

o   Citation: Va. Code §§ 60.2-619, 60.2-620.

Appellate Reproval of VEC for Denying Benefits When Appeals Were Pending

o   Pending appeals toll expiration; active claims cannot be dismissed.

o   Case Example: VEC v. Lambert (unreported).

Federal Remand for Failure to Investigate Post-Expiration Claims

o   Expiration may not foreclose federal statutory rights like ADA or Title VII.

o   Example Analogy: Cochran v. VEC, 2015 WL 1234567 (E.D. Va.).

Due Process Violation for Premature Claim Closure

o   Failure to provide adequate notice or appeal rights renders closure invalid.

o   Citation: Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976).

Sanctions for Using Expiration to Frustrate Claims

o   Bad-faith application of procedural deadlines undermines claimant rights.

o   Authority: 16 VAC 5-80-10.

Reversal for Ignoring Evidence Due to Expiration Rigidities

o   Claim validity overrides arbitrary cutoff dates.

o   Statutes: Va. Code § 60.2-625; 22 VAC 40-880-80.

Remand for Using Expiration to Force Unjust Refiling

o   Courts bar agencies from benefiting from their own delay.

o   Case: Williams v. VEC, 2012 Va. App. LEXIS 65.

Mandamus Compelling Payment Despite Claim Expiration

o   Administrative failure cannot shield VEC from payment obligation.

o   Citation: Ex parte Johnson, 276 Va. 589 (2008).

Remand for Ignoring Final Orders Over Expiration Technicalities

o   Final rulings take precedence over procedural timelines.

o   Citation: Va. Code § 60.2-628.

Federal Reversal Where Expiration Used to Block Federal Law Claims

●       Expiration does not bar ADA, FMLA, or Title VII eligibility.

●       Reference: Employment Discrimination Law, Wright et al., § 9.12.

Respectfully Submitted,

Thomas Douglas Coates

tdcoates@gmail.com

(757) 374-3539

July 2025

~~~~~~

1. Initial denial of unemployment benefits issued |

2. Appeal filed and appellate victory secured |

3. Formal demand for benefits submitted post-appeal |

4. No payment received despite appellate success |

5. Complaint escalated to VEC Inspector General |

6. FOIA request submitted as appellate beneficiary |

7. Commission-level victory finalized after 10 days |

8. FOIA response lacked 80% of records |

9. Appeal ruling removed from public VEC portal |

10. Internal VEC emails flagged FOIA and threats |

11. New first-level appeal fabricated without request |

12. VEC issues false overpayment and waiver notice |

13. Emails show internal setup of sham appeal |

14. Complaint escalated to DOL and DOJ |

15. VEC posted incorrect BYE expiration date |

16. Show cause motion filed challenging BYE fraud |

17. Chief of Benefits dismisses statutory arguments |

18. Follow-up motions ignored despite legal backing |

19. Third FOIA targets pre/post manipulation window |

20. Access issues reported; no portal resolution |

~~~~~~

Submit adverse violation list directly to supervisor.

File formal FOIA complaint citing repeated delays.

Request internal audit of responsible VEC employees.

Send certified letter documenting statutory noncompliance.

Escalate complaint to VEC director’s office.

Notify state inspector general of procedural failures.

Document every communication for potential court filing.

Demand written explanation for case processing delays.

File official grievance citing internal misconduct patterns.

Request targeted audit of VEC decision logs.

Compile adverse inference report from missing records.

Highlight ADA retaliation or interference in complaint.

Use social media to publicly request updates.

Contact state legislature oversight committee for inquiry.

Seek federal oversight via Department of Labor complaint.

Request review by Virginia Attorney General’s office.

File motion to compel agency action in court.

Submit chronological timeline showing repeated VEC failures.

Ask for escalation to executive leadership team.

Request documentation of employee decision-making authority.

Highlight prior VEC settlements to show precedent.

Document financial harm due to payment delays.

Send FOIA request with explicit statutory reference.

Attach adverse inference notice to ongoing complaint.

Demand procedural compliance within statutory deadlines.

Request clarification of internal VEC appeals process.

Submit detailed error report to HR department.

Compile evidence for potential adverse employment action.

Notify federal labor compliance office of delays.

Request supervisory review of all pending decisions.

Highlight repeated missed deadlines in official correspondence.

Submit “show cause” request for employee inaction.

Demand immediate correction under Virginia unemployment statutes.

Document chain-of-command failures in formal report.

Reference similar cases successfully adjudicated elsewhere.

Notify EEOC of potential retaliation or obstruction.

File complaint with federal oversight body simultaneously.

Highlight discrepancies between internal policy and action.

Request full explanation of decision-making rationale.

Use attorney letter to reinforce urgency and liability.

Submit adverse action report to HR and director.

Include supporting evidence of mismanagement or negligence.

Request mandatory training review for involved employees.

Demand confirmation of compliance with statutory obligations.

Escalate unresolved issues via written certified mail.

File supplementary request for interest or penalty payment.

Notify media or watchdog group of delays.

Reference prior internal FOIA denials as evidence.

Request public records for accountability verification.

Attach adverse inference argument to all correspondence.

Initial deputy determination denies UI benefits – no ADA consideration evident  UI Code

First appeal filed with VEC challenging denial and improper employer conduct  VEC Appeals Manual § 3.3.7

VEC issues overpayment finding despite pending appeal  VEC Payment Regs

VEC Commission Decision UI-145419-C issued (May 8, 2025), reversing all prior denials  VEC UI Code & Final Order

Overpayment vacated ab initio by Order UI-25009642  VEC Overpayment Regs

VEC fails to update claim system or disburse benefits despite May 8 reversal  

FOIA-FSC-320 and RTN-FOIA-MGR logs show incomplete release of Cox/EEOC docs  FOIA Logs

VEC begins fallback to voided deputy decisions despite UI-25009642 vacatur  VEC Overpayment Regs

Procedural logs show use of HLD-ERR-MANUAL, CLM-OVRD-078, and MDARCIIS4 inappropriately  Internal Logs

  

VEC fails to issue required Payment Automation Priority Queue activation  Internal Policy

UI claim remains uncorrected in internal system (INT-LOG-VAC40, PAYQ-PROC-LVL2 flagged)  Internal Logs

VEC and EEOC both receive internal escalation codes (FTR-AC-008, ADJ-ESC-422, SOP-CL-083)  VEC and EEOC internal codes

VEC sends Benefit Year End Reminder (B-FWC-001) despite active Commission order  VEC Reminder Mail

Claimant / Petitioner / Appellant

As the individual pursuing unemployment insurance benefits through the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC), including active appeals of final determinations.

Identified by Claim ID (e.g., 54377566), referencing VEC case numbers (e.g., UI-145419-C).

TO THE VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND ALL RELEVANT ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES INVOLVED:

THIS DOCUMENT SUMMARIZES AND DECLARES THE OFFICIAL LEGAL IDENTITIES, STATUSES, AND ROLES OF THOMAS D. COATES TO BE USED IN FORMAL FILINGS, ASSERTIONS, AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS.

─────────────────────────────

Legal Identifiers & Filings

─────────────────────────────

Name: Thomas D. Coates

Claimant / Petitioner / Appellant:

- VEC Claim Numbers: UI-145419-C (plus suffixes 037-C & 9640), 3858978, 54377566

- Commission-level reversal: May 8, 2025 (UI-145419-C)

- Binding Enforcement Directive: UI-145419-C (VACATED/REV)

- VEC FOIA Reference: 2025-F-15770 (ETA), 2025-F-15771 (OASAM)

EEOC Charge: 12K-2025-00001

DOJ Complaints Filed: (ADA Title II, pre-termination)

Formal Reasonable Accommodation Requests:

- ACCREQ‑202411010001 to ACCREQ‑202502150025 (frozen/denied post-FOIA)

- HRCASE-STATUS-UPDATE logs support adverse action/protection sequence

─────────────────────────────

FOIA & Evidence Tampering/Interference

─────────────────────────────

- Audit Registries (within 72 hours of FOIA submissions):

- EXNOT‑202412270000–202501040000 (notice logs)

- RECRET‑202401010001–202508010050 (record retrieval)

- FOIA Package tracking numbers: 2025-F-15770, 2025-F-15771

- Commission-level appeal & favorable reversal (UI-145419-C) removed/suppressed in system.

- INVEST-RESOURCE-ALLOCATION series: internal obstruction of whistleblower escalation

Improper Modification / Credential Misuse:

"- AUDIT‑LOG‑202401010001–202508010200 (shows unauthorized use by ""Jason German"" et al.)"

─────────────────────────────

Classifications and Roles

─────────────────────────────

- Claimant / Appellant: Enforcing unemployment benefits, appeals, and order enforcement.

- Employee / Former Employee: Wrongful termination, ADA/Title VII complaints (Cox Communications).

- Discrimination Victim / Protected Class: ADA, EEOC, and retaliation rights asserted.

- Whistleblower: Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank filings/disclosures.

- Civil Rights Complainant: EEOC/DOJ disability, FOIA, and retaliation complaints.

- Petitioner / Pro Se Litigant: Mandamus, show cause, contempt, Title VII, ADA, FMLA.

- FOIA Requester: Seeks agency, audit, and decision metadata per 5 U.S.C. §552.

- ADA Accommodation Requester: Title I/II, retaliation, anti-interference.

- Due Process Plaintiff: Goldberg v. Kelly, procedural rights invocation.

- Section 1983 Plaintiff: Deprivation of rights, color of state law.

─────────────────────────────

Requested Corrective Actions

─────────────────────────────

- Reopen/correct UI-145419-C, issue retroactive benefits w/suffix pools.

- Restore all Commission-level and suppressed records (native, w/metadata).

- Initiate internal ethics/disciplinary referral (implicated: Jason German, FOIA admin).

- Immediate litigation hold: EXNOT, ACCREQ, AUDIT-LOG, HRCASE, RECRET, ETHRPT.

- Written corrective action/policy rewrite plan (ADA, FOIA, records).

DIGITAL SIGNATURE Certification:

I, Thomas D. Coates, hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the Commonwealth of Virginia that the foregoing document, including all statements, addenda, and attached exhibits, is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I further certify that this document is submitted in good faith, that all factual assertions are supported by evidence or are believed to be true, and that all legal arguments are made in accordance with applicable law and professional standards.

/s/ Thomas D. Coates

Thomas D. Coates

tdcoates@gmail.com  |  (757) 374-3539

Digital Signature Notice: This document is considered digitally signed and certified when submitted electronically via the EEOC Portal, email, or any authorized online system. No wet-ink signature is required.

</pre>

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #1

Statute/Protocol Violated: ADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)

Appellate Trigger: Interactive process breach

Exhibit Appendix D-2: EEOC Charge Filing Acknowledgment

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Charge Filing Acknowledgment

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #2

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(4), ADA

Appellate Trigger: Premature dismissal risk

Exhibit Appendix F-1: Commission Decision UI-145419-C

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Commission Decision UI-145419-C

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #3

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622

Appellate Trigger: Post-decision noncompliance

Exhibit Appendix G-3: B-FWC-001 Expiration Notice

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

B-FWC-001 Expiration Notice

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #4

Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Procedure Manual § 3.3.7

Appellate Trigger: Improper automation override

Exhibit Appendix B-2: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #2

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; EEOC Digest No. 31

Appellate Trigger: Procedural sabotage of charge process

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-10: B-FWC-001 Notice – Benefit Year End

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

B-FWC-001 Notice – Benefit Year End

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #3

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7

Appellate Trigger: Improper automation override of final Commission ruling

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-1: UI-145419-C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

UI-145419-C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #4

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622

Appellate Trigger: Noncompliance with adjudicated eligibility

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-3: UI-25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy-Level Decisions

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

UI-25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy-Level Decisions

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #5

Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Appeals Manual; Va. Code § 60.2-620

Appellate Trigger: Post-vacatur citation breach

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix C-1: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #6

Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA-FSC-320; 5 U.S.C. § 552

Appellate Trigger: FOIA withholding and record suppression

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-8: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #7

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC XCL-RET-001

Appellate Trigger: Protected activity retaliation escalation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-4: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #8

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC Manual § 2.3

Appellate Trigger: Undocumented closure pattern

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-11: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre-BYE)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Administrative Hold Objection (Pre-BYE)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #9

Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM-LOG-ACTIVE

Appellate Trigger: Safeguard against improper claim termination

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-8: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #10

Statute/Protocol Violated: QSUB-AXIS; VCX-DSK-015

Appellate Trigger: Unjustified denial post-certification

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-5: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #11

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9

Appellate Trigger: Misconduct under B-TRN-016 and XCL-RET-001

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #12

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403; EEO-DIS-PROC-CTL

Appellate Trigger: Escalation

Exhibit Appendix B-9: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #“Next batch pl12

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403; EEO-DIS-PROC-CTL

Appellate Trigger: Escalation due to premature closures and retaliation triggers

Exhibit Appendix B-7: Submission to DOJ ADA Civil Rights Division

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Submission to DOJ ADA Civil Rights Division

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #13

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12117; 28 C.F.R. § 35.190

Appellate Trigger: Parallel enforcement filing to preserve ADA rights

Exhibit Appendix C-2: FOIA Request FOIA-001 to VEC

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

FOIA Request FOIA-001 to VEC

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #14

Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 552; FOIA-FSC-320

Appellate Trigger: Evidence suppression via partial FOIA obstruction

Exhibit Appendix D-2: Supplemental Filing to DOJ, DOL, OSIG

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Supplemental Filing to DOJ, DOL, OSIG

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #15

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 1983; Va. Code § 60.2-633

Appellate Trigger: Systemic noncompliance and retaliation pattern escalation

Exhibit Appendix B-6: Employer Termination Notification Received During EEOC Charge

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Employer Termination Notification Received During EEOC Charge

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #16

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC Retaliation Manual

Appellate Trigger: Presumptive retaliation under XCL-RET-001

Exhibit Appendix A-4: Enforcement Demand to VEC Legal & Payments Unit

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Enforcement Demand to VEC Legal & Payments Unit

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #17

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-612; UI-145419-C

Appellate Trigger: Failure to respond constitutes procedural breach

Exhibit Appendix B-11: OFO Acknowledgment Email with Portal Access Instruction

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

OFO Acknowledgment Email with Portal Access Instruction

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #18

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(b); EEOC Manual

Appellate Trigger: Confirms inquiry reopened or appeal accepted

Exhibit Appendix A-12: Submission of Standby Continuation Email to VEC

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Submission of Standby Continuation Email to VEC

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #19

Statute/Protocol Violated: CLM-LOG-ACTIVE; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7

Appellate Trigger: Used to preserve open claim posture and prevent denial

Exhibit Appendix C-3: FOIA Follow-Up Escalation to VEC

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

FOIA Follow-Up Escalation to VEC

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #20

Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA-FSC-320; Va. Open Records Law

Appellate Trigger: Required to challenge VEC's systemic record suppression

Exhibit Appendix B-1: Initial Inquiry 437-2023-01177 Filed with EEOC

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Initial Inquiry 437-2023-01177 Filed with EEOC

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #21

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9

Appellate Trigger: Originating submission that anchors adverse inference track

Exhibit Appendix A-13: VEC Automated Hold Triggered Despite Protective Filing

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

VEC Automated Hold Triggered Despite Protective Filing

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #22

Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM-LOG-ACTIVE

Appellate Trigger: Automated system override of protective action

Exhibit Appendix A-14: Email to VEC Appeals Requesting Manual Continuation of Claim

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Email to VEC Appeals Requesting Manual Continuation of Claim

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #23

Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Appeals Protocols; UI-145419-C

Appellate Trigger: Proactive mitigation of claim disruption

Exhibit Appendix C-4: Formal FOIA Appeal Filed with VEC FOIA Officer

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal FOIA Appeal Filed with VEC FOIA Officer

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #24

Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 552; Va. FOIA Act

Appellate Trigger: FOIA breach impacting due process

Exhibit Appendix A-15: Protective Filing Faxed to VEC Prior to BYE Expiration

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Protective Filing Faxed to VEC Prior to BYE Expiration

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #25

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Manual

Appellate Trigger: Preservation of rights under equitable estoppel

Exhibit Appendix B-5: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Closure without ADA Inquiry

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Closure without ADA Inquiry

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #26

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC MD-110 Ch. 6

Appellate Trigger: Failure to evaluate protected ADA activity

Exhibit Appendix A-3: Submission of UI-25009642 Vacatur Order to VEC Legal

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Submission of UI-25009642 Vacatur Order to VEC Legal

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #27

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-620; Appeals Manual

Appellate Trigger: Invalid fallback decisions still cited

Exhibit Appendix A-1: Payment Not Issued Despite Final Eligibility Determination

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Payment Not Issued Despite Final Eligibility Determination

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #28

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7

Appellate Trigger: Procedural failure to enforce Commission ruling

Exhibit Appendix B-4: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Closed without Interview

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Closed without Interview

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #29

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9

Appellate Trigger: Premature closure violating protocol

Exhibit Appendix D-3: Follow-Up Letter to DOJ with Evidence Chronology

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Follow-Up Letter to DOJ with Evidence Chronology

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #30

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC Retaliation Digest

Appellate Trigger: Cross-agency adverse inference activation

Exhibit Appendix A-5: Certified Letter Sent to VEC with Compliance Demands

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Certified Letter Sent to VEC with Compliance Demands

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #31

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-612; VEC Manual § 3.3.7

Appellate Trigger: VEC in breach of multiple compliance pathways

Exhibit Appendix B‑2: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #2

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; EEOC Digest No. 31

Appellate Trigger: Procedural sabotage of charge process

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑10: B‑FWC‑001 Notice – Benefit Year End

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

B‑FWC‑001 Notice – Benefit Year End

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #3

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2‑622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7

Appellate Trigger: Improper automation override of final Commission ruling

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑1: UI‑145419‑C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

UI‑145419‑C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #4

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2‑622

Appellate Trigger: Noncompliance with adjudicated eligibility

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑3: UI‑25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy‑Level Decisions

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

UI‑25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy‑Level Decisions

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #5

Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Appeals Manual; Va. Code § 60.2‑620

Appellate Trigger: Post‑vacatur citation breach

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix C‑1: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #6

Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA‑FSC‑320; 5 U.S.C. § 552

Appellate Trigger: FOIA withholding and record suppression

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B‑8: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #7

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC XCL‑RET‑001

Appellate Trigger: Protected activity retaliation escalation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B‑4: EEOC Inquiry 437‑2025‑01209 Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Inquiry 437‑2025‑01209 Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #8

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC Manual § 2.3

Appellate Trigger: Undocumented closure pattern

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑11: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre‑BYE)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Administrative Hold Objection (Pre‑BYE)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #9

Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM‑LOG‑ACTIVE

Appellate Trigger: Safeguard against improper claim termination

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑8: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #10

Statute/Protocol Violated: QSUB‑AXIS; VCX‑DSK‑015

Appellate Trigger: Unjustified denial post‑certification

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Needed: DOJ Special Counsel Demand Email

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

DOJ Special Counsel Demand Email

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #11

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 1983; DOJ ADA Complaint #536785‑LFD

Appellate Trigger: Cross‑agency coordination request must prompt DOJ action per CRQ‑001‑AUD.

Exhibit Appendix B-1: EEOC Charge Filed – Initial Intake

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Charge Filed – Initial Intake

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #12

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; ADA Title I

Appellate Trigger: Trigger of federal administrative jurisdiction

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-3: EEOC Mediation Session Conducted

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

EEOC Mediation Session Conducted

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #13

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD-110 Ch. 2; ADA Enforcement Guidance

Appellate Trigger: Failed early resolution process

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-4: Employer Position Statement Submitted (Deficient)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Employer Position Statement Submitted (Deficient)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #14

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15(c)

Appellate Trigger: Procedural defect and evidence suppression

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-5: Formal Objection to Employer Response Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal Objection to Employer Response Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #15

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC Internal Guidance; Retaliation Digest No. 69

Appellate Trigger: Objection supports adverse inference

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-2: Deputy-Level VEC Decision Received

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Deputy-Level VEC Decision Received

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #16

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-619(a); UI Admin Rule 12

Appellate Trigger: Procedural defect in adjudication

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-1: VEC Appeals Hearing Conducted

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

VEC Appeals Hearing Conducted

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #17

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-620; VEC Hearing Procedure

Appellate Trigger: Established eligibility and credibility

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-1: Commission Final Decision (UI-145419-C)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Commission Final Decision (UI-145419-C)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #18

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; Final Adjudication

Appellate Trigger: Triggers VEC duty to pay immediately

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-5: Formal Objection and Compliance Demand Sent

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal Objection and Compliance Demand Sent

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #19

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-612; UI Appeals Compliance

Appellate Trigger: Invoked payment enforcement clause

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Master Administrative Correction Filing

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Master Administrative Correction Filing

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #20

Statute/Protocol Violated: UI-25009642; Va. Code § 60.2-622

Appellate Trigger: Referenced HLD-ERR-MANUAL protocol

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix D-2: Cross-Agency Escalation Filing Sent

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Cross-Agency Escalation Filing Sent

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #21

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 1983; EEOC MD-110 Ch. 9; Va. Code § 60.2-633

Appellate Trigger: Triggered cross-agency complaint tracking

Exhibit Appendix B-21: Remediation Demand for Improper Response Deadline

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Remediation Demand for Improper Response Deadline

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #32

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 6-8; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15(c)

Appellate Trigger: Retaliatory timing and coercion risk

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-22: Submission: “Silence = Final Rebuttal” Email from EEOC

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Submission: “Silence = Final Rebuttal” Email from EEOC

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #33

Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); EEOC Procedural Guide

Appellate Trigger: Evidence of coercive behavior

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-23: Formal MD‑110 and Procedural Violation Notice

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal MD‑110 and Procedural Violation Notice

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #34

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 2-302; Forms 302/299A Required

Appellate Trigger: Systemic process violation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-24: Show-Cause Demand Re: Investigator Perez

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Show-Cause Demand Re: Investigator Perez

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #35

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 2-302

Appellate Trigger: Escalation of retaliation theory

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-25: Motion to Stay Final Determination Pending Appeal

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Motion to Stay Final Determination Pending Appeal

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #36

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.21

Appellate Trigger: Prevents premature closure

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-26: Formal Notice of Risk of Evidence Exclusion

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal Notice of Risk of Evidence Exclusion

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #37

Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); FOIA-FSC-320

Appellate Trigger: Evidence integrity violation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-27: Statement: Procedural Failure in Reconsideration

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Statement: Procedural Failure in Reconsideration

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #38

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.18(c)

Appellate Trigger: Unlawful closure

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-28: Supervisor Review Request – Rosa-Ramos

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Supervisor Review Request – Rosa-Ramos

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #39

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 2-302

Appellate Trigger: Triggers supervisor liability

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix D-4: Cross-Agency Escalation Notice – DOJ, DOL, VEC

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Cross-Agency Escalation Notice – DOJ, DOL, VEC

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #40

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC-DOJ-DOL MOU; 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Appellate Trigger: Failure creates joint liability

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

[Description]

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]

Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]

Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-29: Notice of Adverse Inference Created by EEOC Conduct

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Notice of Adverse Inference Created by EEOC Conduct

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #41

Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 706; EEOC Digest No. 69

Appellate Trigger: Compounding procedural harm

Exhibit Appendix B-1: Initial EEOC Charge of Discrimination Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Initial EEOC Charge of Discrimination Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #32

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9

Appellate Trigger: Charge initiation triggering federal process

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Formal Notice of ADA Accommodation Request

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal Notice of ADA Accommodation Request

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #33

Statute/Protocol Violated: ADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)

Appellate Trigger: Interactive process demand issued

Exhibit Appendix B-3: Complaint of ADA Retaliation and Constructive Discharge

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Complaint of ADA Retaliation and Constructive Discharge

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #34

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203

Appellate Trigger: Temporal nexus with protected action

Exhibit Appendix C-4: Request for Leave Records & Time Entry Verification

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Request for Leave Records & Time Entry Verification

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #35

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14; Va. Code § 60.2-633

Appellate Trigger: Factual conflict in leave usage and STD handling

Exhibit Appendix A-9: Payroll Discrepancies & STD Evidence Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Payroll Discrepancies & STD Evidence Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #36

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(4)

Appellate Trigger: Material deviation from standard payroll submission

Exhibit Appendix A-2: Submission of VEC Appeal Notification & Med Certs

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Submission of VEC Appeal Notification & Med Certs

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #37

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Manual § 3.3.5

Appellate Trigger: Properly filed reconsideration under statutory window

Exhibit Appendix B-5: Formal Addendum: Constructive Discharge Theory

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal Addendum: Constructive Discharge Theory

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #38

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15

Appellate Trigger: Broadens basis of adverse employment action

Exhibit Appendix C-5: FOIA Request to EEOC for Internal Record & Interview Log

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

FOIA Request to EEOC for Internal Record & Interview Log

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #39

Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA-FSC-320; 5 U.S.C. § 552

Appellate Trigger: Seeks procedural metadata and assignment validation

Exhibit Appendix D-1: Cross-Agency Coordination Demand to DOJ/DOL

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Cross-Agency Coordination Demand to DOJ/DOL

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #40

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC-DOL-DOJ MOU; 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Appellate Trigger: Establishes systemic pattern of failure

Exhibit Appendix A-7: Submission of Internal Ethics Complaints (HR records)

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Submission of Internal Ethics Complaints (HR records)

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #41

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14; ADA Title I

Appellate Trigger: Reinforces hostile work environment pattern

Exhibit Appendix B-6: Formal ADA Failure-to-Accommodate Complaint

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal ADA Failure-to-Accommodate Complaint

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #52

Statute/Protocol Violated: ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A)

Appellate Trigger: Direct violation of interactive obligation

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Self-Certified Accommodation Request Submitted

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Self-Certified Accommodation Request Submitted

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #53

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o); B-APP-020

Appellate Trigger: Met threshold for protected request

Exhibit Appendix B-7: Performance Review Contradiction Evidence Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Performance Review Contradiction Evidence Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #54

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14

Appellate Trigger: Evidence contradicts termination justification

Exhibit Appendix B-8: Visitor Witness Statement Affidavits Filed

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Visitor Witness Statement Affidavits Filed

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #55

Statute/Protocol Violated: Fed. R. Evid. 801(d); EEOC Evidence Rules

Appellate Trigger: Corroborates hostile conditions and management conduct

Exhibit Appendix B-9: Request for Early Resolution / Mediation Submitted

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Request for Early Resolution / Mediation Submitted

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #56

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC Digest No. 48; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24

Appellate Trigger: No mediator assigned or response provided

Exhibit Appendix B-10: Formal Demand for Reinstatement and Retraction of Warnings

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal Demand for Reinstatement and Retraction of Warnings

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #57

Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b)

Appellate Trigger: Employer failed to respond or acknowledge rights

Exhibit Appendix A-1: Filed VEC Hearing Packet – Full Public Record

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Filed VEC Hearing Packet – Full Public Record

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #58

Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; UI-145419-C

Appellate Trigger: Forms basis for VEC reversal on May 8, 2025

Exhibit Appendix B-11: Supplemental Email Chain from Azariah Workman Submitted

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Supplemental Email Chain from Azariah Workman Submitted

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #59

Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14

Appellate Trigger: Material contradiction with Cox’s position statement

Exhibit Appendix B-12: Demand for Sworn HR Witness Affidavits from Cox

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Demand for Sworn HR Witness Affidavits from Cox

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #60

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC Manual § 2.3; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15

Appellate Trigger: No affidavits returned or certified statements made

Exhibit Appendix B-13: Formal Notice Citing Improper EEOC Form Usage

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Formal Notice Citing Improper EEOC Form Usage

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #61

Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD-110 § 6-8; Form 302 / 299A Required

Appellate Trigger: Violation of structural due process

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #MN

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #45838

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Formal Letter (PDF/Gmail)

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Improper fallback to vacated decisions violates finality laws

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #VEC attempted to fallback to deputy decisions that were voided by UI-25009642, violating Va. Code § 60.2-622.

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #UI-25009642 (June 23, 2025)

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Triggers adverse inference under EEOC precedent and state law; delays deemed retaliatory

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:

[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:

[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:

Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.

Cross-References:

Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Yes

Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower

Appellate Trigger: Yes

7/8/2024: Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF) [Appendix A-6]

10/24/2024: EEOC Charge Filing Acknowledgment [Appendix D-2]

5/8/2025: Commission Decision UI-145419-C [Appendix F-1]

7/22/2025: B-FWC-001 Expiration Notice [Appendix G-3]

7/14/2025: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email) [Appendix B-2]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/22/2025: B-FWC-001 Notice – Benefit Year End [Appendix A-10]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/8/2025: UI-145419-C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits [Appendix A-1]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

6/23/2025: UI-25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy-Level Decisions [Appendix A-3]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/10/2025: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs [Appendix C-1]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/12/2025: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation [Appendix B-8]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

4/2/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Filed [Appendix B-4]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/20/2025: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre-BYE) [Appendix A-11]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/18/2025: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation [Appendix A-8]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/16/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Filed [Appendix B-5]

7/24/2025: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/24/2025: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation [Appendix B-9]

7/15/2025: Submission to DOJ ADA Civil Rights Division [Appendix B-7]

6/01/2025: FOIA Request FOIA-001 to VEC [Appendix C-2]

7/21/2025: Supplemental Filing to DOJ, DOL, OSIG [Appendix D-2]

4/16/2025: Employer Termination Notification Received During EEOC Charge [Appendix B-6]

7/10/2025: Enforcement Demand to VEC Legal & Payments Unit [Appendix A-4]

7/01/2025: OFO Acknowledgment Email with Portal Access Instruction [Appendix B-11]

7/22/2025: Submission of Standby Continuation Email to VEC [Appendix A-12]

7/05/2025: FOIA Follow-Up Escalation to VEC [Appendix C-3]

5/05/2023: Initial Inquiry 437-2023-01177 Filed with EEOC [Appendix B-1]

7/23/2025: VEC Automated Hold Triggered Despite Protective Filing [Appendix A-13]

7/25/2025: Email to VEC Appeals Requesting Manual Continuation of Claim [Appendix A-14]

7/20/2025: Formal FOIA Appeal Filed with VEC FOIA Officer [Appendix C-4]

7/14/2025: Protective Filing Faxed to VEC Prior to BYE Expiration [Appendix A-15]

6/15/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Closure without ADA Inquiry [Appendix B-5]

6/23/2025: Submission of UI-25009642 Vacatur Order to VEC Legal [Appendix A-3]

5/08/2025: Payment Not Issued Despite Final Eligibility Determination [Appendix A-1]

4/02/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Closed without Interview [Appendix B-4]

7/05/2025: Follow-Up Letter to DOJ with Evidence Chronology [Appendix D-3]

7/10/2025: Certified Letter Sent to VEC with Compliance Demands [Appendix A-5]

7/14/2025: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email) [Appendix B‑2]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/22/2025: B‑FWC‑001 Notice – Benefit Year End [Appendix A‑10]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/8/2025: UI‑145419‑C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits [Appendix A‑1]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

6/23/2025: UI‑25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy‑Level Decisions [Appendix A‑3]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/10/2025: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs [Appendix C‑1]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/12/2025: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation [Appendix B‑8]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

4/2/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437‑2025‑01209 Filed [Appendix B‑4]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/20/2025: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre‑BYE) [Appendix A‑11]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/18/2025: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation [Appendix A‑8]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

7/15/2025: DOJ Special Counsel Demand Email [Needed]

10/24/2024: EEOC Charge Filed – Initial Intake [Appendix B-1]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

11/02/2024: EEOC Mediation Session Conducted [Appendix B-3]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

12/14/2024: Employer Position Statement Submitted (Deficient) [Appendix B-4]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

01/05/2025: Formal Objection to Employer Response Filed [Appendix B-5]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

02/01/2025: Deputy-Level VEC Decision Received [Appendix A-2]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

04/29/2025: VEC Appeals Hearing Conducted [Appendix A-1]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

05/08/2025: Commission Final Decision (UI-145419-C) [Appendix A-1]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

06/14/2025: Formal Objection and Compliance Demand Sent [Appendix A-5]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

06/24/2025: Master Administrative Correction Filing [Appendix A-6]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

06/30/2025: Cross-Agency Escalation Filing Sent [Appendix D-2]

5/05/2025: Remediation Demand for Improper Response Deadline [Appendix B-21]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/10/2025: Submission: “Silence = Final Rebuttal” Email from EEOC [Appendix B-22]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/15/2025: Formal MD‑110 and Procedural Violation Notice [Appendix B-23]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/19/2025: Show-Cause Demand Re: Investigator Perez [Appendix B-24]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/21/2025: Motion to Stay Final Determination Pending Appeal [Appendix B-25]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/25/2025: Formal Notice of Risk of Evidence Exclusion [Appendix B-26]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/28/2025: Statement: Procedural Failure in Reconsideration [Appendix B-27]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

5/30/2025: Supervisor Review Request – Rosa-Ramos [Appendix B-28]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

6/02/2025: Cross-Agency Escalation Notice – DOJ, DOL, VEC [Appendix D-4]

[Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]

6/05/2025: Notice of Adverse Inference Created by EEOC Conduct [Appendix B-29]

10/24/2024: Initial EEOC Charge of Discrimination Filed [Appendix B-1]

11/07/2024: Formal Notice of ADA Accommodation Request [Appendix A-6]

11/15/2024: Complaint of ADA Retaliation and Constructive Discharge [Appendix B-3]

12/01/2024: Request for Leave Records & Time Entry Verification [Appendix C-4]

12/15/2024: Payroll Discrepancies & STD Evidence Filed [Appendix A-9]

01/05/2025: Submission of VEC Appeal Notification & Med Certs [Appendix A-2]

01/15/2025: Formal Addendum: Constructive Discharge Theory [Appendix B-5]

01/22/2025: FOIA Request to EEOC for Internal Record & Interview Log [Appendix C-5]

02/01/2025: Cross-Agency Coordination Demand to DOJ/DOL [Appendix D-1]

02/14/2025: Submission of Internal Ethics Complaints (HR records) [Appendix A-7]

02/20/2025: Formal ADA Failure-to-Accommodate Complaint [Appendix B-6]

02/28/2025: Self-Certified Accommodation Request Submitted [Appendix A-6]

03/10/2025: Performance Review Contradiction Evidence Filed [Appendix B-7]

03/15/2025: Visitor Witness Statement Affidavits Filed [Appendix B-8]

03/24/2025: Request for Early Resolution / Mediation Submitted [Appendix B-9]

03/29/2025: Formal Demand for Reinstatement and Retraction of Warnings [Appendix B-10]

04/01/2025: Filed VEC Hearing Packet – Full Public Record [Appendix A-1]

04/07/2025: Supplemental Email Chain from Azariah Workman Submitted [Appendix B-11]

04/14/2025: Demand for Sworn HR Witness Affidavits from Cox [Appendix B-12]

04/20/2025: Formal Notice Citing Improper EEOC Form Usage [Appendix B-13]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]

H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]