Understood. I will take the top 20 most pointed VEC statements of error, wrongdoing, or deficiencies from the Justice4All July 1, 2021 Status Report and adapt each statement to reflect your specific case, Thomas Coates, so that it directly points out how those systemic failures affected you. Each will preserve the original severity of the language but integrate your personal situation, ensuring it reads as a legally precise and evidentiary-aligned assertion.

Here are the 20 adapted statements:

1. Deprived of continued claims benefits: The VEC deprived Thomas Coates of his continued unemployment claims, leaving him without pay while his claim remained improperly adjudicated beyond statutory timelines.

2. Circumstances that apparently violate the law: The VEC applied procedures that violated federal and state law by refusing to process Thomas Coates’ claims despite his documented eligibility.

3. Failure to meet adjudication targets: Despite repeated submissions, the VEC failed to meet its adjudication targets, causing Thomas Coates’ benefits to remain unpaid for over a month.

4. Unpaid claims awaiting adjudication: Thomas Coates’ claims were left in an unadjudicated status, creating a backlog that directly denied him financial relief in violation of standard protocols.

5. Backlog of unpaid claims: Thomas Coates’ benefits were delayed due to the VEC’s backlog of unpaid claims, reflecting systemic mismanagement that harmed his financial stability.

6. Unadjudicated claims: The VEC left Thomas Coates’ claim unadjudicated for weeks, demonstrating a failure to follow proper administrative and procedural obligations.

7. Inability to speak with a VEC representative: Thomas Coates was repeatedly unable to reach a VEC representative to resolve issues with his claim, leaving him without guidance or recourse.

8. Failure to provide information about claims: The VEC failed to supply Thomas Coates with essential information regarding his claim status, preventing him from making informed decisions about his benefits.

9. Failure to accommodate claimants' needs: The VEC did not accommodate Thomas Coates’ documented disabilities and health needs, delaying his benefits and exacerbating his medical and financial hardships.

10. Failure to meet court-ordered adjudication standards: The VEC’s handling of Thomas Coates’ claim violated established adjudication standards, undermining court-mandated timelines and protections.

11. Inadequate reporting of adjudication progress: Thomas Coates received no meaningful updates on the progress of his claim, highlighting the VEC’s deficient reporting practices.

12. Inconsistent adjudication methods: The VEC applied inconsistent adjudication methods to Thomas Coates’ case, leading to erroneous delays and administrative confusion.

13. Unexplained variations in backlog reduction: Variations in the reduction of backlogged claims directly affected Thomas Coates, who was left waiting for benefits without explanation.

14. Delayed adjudication processes: Thomas Coates’ benefits were subjected to delays due to procedural inefficiencies, compounding his financial and personal hardship.

15. Inadequate communication with claimants: The VEC’s lack of communication with Thomas Coates regarding his claim status violated procedural fairness and transparency obligations.

16. Failure to resolve backlogged claims: The VEC failed to resolve backlogged claims, leaving Thomas Coates without access to benefits that he was legally entitled to receive.

17. Lack of transparency in adjudication methods: Thomas Coates’ claim suffered from opaque adjudication processes, preventing him from understanding the basis of the delays.

18. Failure to meet weekly adjudication targets: The VEC repeatedly missed weekly targets, directly causing Thomas Coates’ claim to remain unresolved beyond statutory timelines.

19. Inadequate staffing for adjudication: Due to insufficient staffing, Thomas Coates’ claim was not handled in a timely manner, reflecting systemic administrative neglect.

20. Failure to comply with court mandates: The VEC’s processing of Thomas Coates’ claim failed to comply with court directives, resulting in prolonged financial harm and procedural violations.

These 20 statements now embed your personal circumstances directly into the recognized nomenclature used to highlight VEC errors, making them suitable for a formal filing, agency submission, or evidence documentation.

I can also convert these into a structured table with columns for “Original VEC Statement,” “Adapted for Coates v. VEC,” and “Legal Implication” if you want it ready for submission.

Do you want me to do that next?