Brandon T. Bybee, PLC 208 E. Plume St. Suite 327 Norfolk, VA 23510
Dear Mr. Bybee,
I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to present a high-stakes case involving systemic workplace violations, including ADA noncompliance, retaliation, and internal compliance failures at Cox Communications. With 20 years of experience working with telecommunications giants like AT&T, I bring unparalleled insight into industry operations and standards. This case is supported by comprehensive evidence and active investigations, which expose serious gaps within Cox’s HR and compliance frameworks.
Given your firm’s proven success in challenging large corporations on matters related to ADA noncompliance and employee rights, I believe your team is ideally suited to represent my case.
The EEOC case is currently scheduled for its initial hearing on March 11, 2025. Below is a summary of the case from the EEOC portal, along with information on Cox Communications’ legal representation:
| Case Number | 12K-2025-00001 |
|---|---|
| Submission Date | October 24, 2024 |
| Type | CHARGE |
| Status | Mediation Scheduled |
Attorney: Justin Myers
Littler Mendelson, P.C.
2301 McGee St, 7th Floor, Kansas City, MO 64108
Additionally, I remain employed at Cox Communications; however, my short-term disability benefits were terminated on November 21, 2024, in a coordinated effort between MetLife and Cox. This further underscores the retaliation and systemic failures at play.
I have been employed by Cox Communications as an Inbound Sales Representative. Despite presenting clear medical documentation, my requests for reasonable accommodations were ignored, delayed, or dismissed. The retaliation that followed further compounded the challenges I faced. Key aspects of the case include:
- ADA Violations: Failure to engage in the interactive process and denial of reasonable accommodations.
- Retaliation: Unjustified changes to performance reviews, workload adjustments, and exclusion from advancement opportunities.
- Systemic Noncompliance: Evidence demonstrates failures within HR, compliance, and executive oversight structures.
Cox Communications has agreed to mediation through the EEOC, signaling acknowledgment of the merit in my claims. This case represents an opportunity to highlight systemic failures and advocate for meaningful reform within a major organization.
| Agency | Status | Focus of Investigation |
|---|---|---|
| EEOC | Mediation Agreement Signed | ADA violations, retaliation claims |
| Department of Labor (OFCCP) | Ongoing | Discrimination in a federal contractor |
| Office of Civil Rights (Virginia) | Ongoing | ADA compliance and systemic discrimination |
| WHD | Ongoing | Improper wage processes and discussions |
Below is the supporting evidence that strengthens the case:
- Medical Documentation: Letters from healthcare providers outlining accommodation needs.
- HR Correspondence: Emails and letters documenting requests, responses, and lack of action.
- Performance Reviews: Documentation of unjustified changes following accommodation requests.
- Grievance Filings: Internal grievance records and responses showcasing procedural failures.
- Visual Summaries: Timelines and charts highlighting patterns of retaliation and noncompliance.
- Workday Systems Audit and Reports: Payroll and HR evidence on similarly situated coworkers.
- MyChart: Medical evidence from providers including cardiology and behavioral health.
| Case Number | Description |
|---|---|
| HRC1147319, HRC1148753, HRC1148762 | General Inquiry case for Thomas Coates |
| HRC1149024 | Performance and compensation case for Thomas Coates |
| HRC1149551 | General Inquiry case for Thomas Coates |
| HRC1152131 | Leave of absence case |
| 110113031138 | Disability claim with MetLife, initiated on July 9, 2024, involving denied claim appeal, salary calculation errors, and missing commissions |
This case represents a critical opportunity to address ADA violations and retaliation claims, and to hold Cox Communications accountable for systemic failures. With my industry knowledge, extensive documentation, and the ongoing momentum from agency investigations, I believe we have a compelling path forward.
I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this case further and provide access to the evidence I’ve compiled. Thank you for considering this opportunity to make a lasting impact.
Sincerely,
Thomas Coates
Email: tdcoates@gmail.com