This submission represents Part I of a comprehensive two-part refutation to Cox Communications' Position Statement, dated April 2025. Its purpose is to formally memorialize the record, vigorously contest assertions that are demonstrably unsupported or factually inaccurate, and compel explicit admission, clarification, or denial of all salient statements and actions documented to date. Part II of this rebuttal will incorporate additional factual appendices, targeted legal analyses pertinent to specific incidents, sworn affidavits, and supplementary evidence substantiating ongoing retaliatory conduct, falsification of records, and systemic procedural transgressions.
All involved parties, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Respondent, and relevant oversight agencies, are hereby formally apprised that this record remains open. All future occurrences, evidentiary submissions, and agency responses will be formally integrated and meticulously preserved for comprehensive cross-agency review and prospective judicial scrutiny.
Scope of Motion:
Position statements and subsequent filings submitted to the EEOC or other regulatory bodies.
Electronic mail and other written correspondence originating from supervisory personnel, Human Resources (HR) representatives, or management.
Communications exchanged via internal chat platforms such as Teams or Slack, pertaining to leave, accommodation requests, or disciplinary actions.
Input and audit logs from Workday, payroll systems, or other HR information systems.
Internal memoranda, digital records, and official accounts of meetings or corrective actions.
Any other documented or system-captured assertion or representation made by Cox Communications or its authorized agents concerning Complainant’s employment, leave status, disciplinary history, or accommodation requests.
It is critical to note that these aforementioned statements are directly refuted by irrefutable documentary evidence, and their propagation constitutes perjury, retaliatory action, and demonstrable bad faith.
);
// Section: Material Contradictions (with responsive table)
const KeyContradictions = () => {
const contradictions = [
{
metlife: 'Your disability claim was received on May 28, 2024 and approved for the period June 3, 2024 through July 1, 2024. (MetLife Letter, June 3, 2024)',
cox: 'No leave or accommodation was requested for absences in June 2024. (Position Statement, April 11, 2025, p.2)',
statute: 'Contradicts assertion of no request. 29 C.F.R. § 1630.9',
},
// ... (add all contradiction rows as in your draft above)
];
return (
Material Contradictions
{contradictions.map((row, idx) => (
))}
MetLife/Record
Cox Statement
Statute/Contradiction
{row.metlife}
{row.cox}
{row.statute}
);
};
// ... (repeat for other sections, using your content and preferred formatting)
const App = () => {
const [activeSection, setActiveSection] = useState('overview');
// Scroll to section
const scrollToSection = (sectionId) => {
const sectionElement = document.getElementById(sectionId);
if (sectionElement) {
sectionElement.scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth' });
setActiveSection(sectionId);
}
};
// IntersectionObserver for active section highlighting
useEffect(() => {
const observer = new window.IntersectionObserver(
(entries) => {
entries.forEach((entry) => {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
setActiveSection(entry.target.id);
}
});
},
{ root: null, rootMargin: '0px', threshold: 0.3 }
);
sections.forEach((section) => {
const el = document.getElementById(section.id);
if (el) observer.observe(el);
});
return () => {
sections.forEach((section) => {
const el = document.getElementById(section.id);
if (el) observer.unobserve(el);
});
};
}, []);
return (
{/* Tailwind CDN */}
{/* Header */}
Formal Rebuttal and Record Memorialization
Thomas D. Coates v. Cox Communications, Inc.
EEOC Charge No.: 12K-2025-00001 | DOJ ADA Complaint No.: 536785-LFD
{/* Table of Contents */}
{/* Sections */}
{/* Add other sections here, following the same pattern */}