Submission Letter for Federal Agencies

NOTICE: The Virginia Employment Commission has REVERSED its prior decision.
My eligibility for unemployment benefits has been fully restored.

Key Points:

The reversal was based on the submission of new evidence and charges that directly contradicted Cox’s assertion that my separation was voluntary.
Multiple written documents in the record established that my termination was not voluntary, and the Commission’s decision reflects this finding.
As a result, I am now eligible to file for current unemployment benefits against Cox, and the record of my appeal—including evidence of wrongful termination and wage issues—has been formally considered by the Commission.

Submission to the Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs, ADA, and WHD

I am writing to notify your office of recent developments and to supplement my prior filings regarding violations of federal law and contractor obligations by Cox. The Virginia Employment Commission (VEC) has reversed its previous denial of my unemployment benefits, finding that my termination was not voluntary and restoring my eligibility. This reversal was made after the Commission reviewed substantial new evidence and documentation I submitted, which directly refuted Cox’s prior assertions and supported my claims of wrongful termination and wage irregularities.

1. Key Contradictions and Case Hinge Points

Accommodation Awareness Contradiction: Cox asserted it was unaware of my accommodation requests prior to the adverse appraisal. However, documentary evidence shows a written request for accommodation was submitted on May 25, 2025, directly contradicting their position.
June 28, 2025 Meeting & Written Warning: The June 28 meeting was purportedly for a final written warning, but no such warning existed. The only prior written warning had been rescinded by HR, and the rescinded warning was issued after my accommodation request, indicating retaliation.
Position Statement Deficiencies: Cox’s position statement to the EEOC contained over 60 unsupported assertions, was unsigned, and lacked affidavits or certified witness interviews.

2. New Inquiry: Termination, Wage Irregularities, and Reporting Violations

Wage Irregularities: Payroll records reveal retroactive changes inconsistent with W-2s and lacking proper notation or explanation, despite Cox’s denials.
False Reporting to Government Agencies: Cox has submitted demonstrably false information to federal agencies, including misrepresentations in position statements and payroll reports.
Retaliatory Actions: The rescinded written warning, issued after my accommodation request and inquiry, supports a claim of retaliation.

3. Legal Context and Citations

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Failure to provide reasonable accommodations and retaliation for protected activity violate 42 U.S.C. § 12112.
EEOC Guidelines: The lack of investigation and evidentiary support in Cox’s submissions undermine anti-discrimination enforcement.
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): Retroactive payroll changes and wage irregularities violate 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.
False Claims and Reporting: Misreporting to federal agencies may violate federal contractor compliance rules.

4. Requested Actions

Investigate the timeline and handling of accommodation requests and retaliation claims.
Review Cox’s position statement for evidentiary sufficiency and procedural compliance.
Audit payroll and wage reporting for compliance with federal law and contractor requirements.
Examine false statements and reporting to federal agencies, with enforcement of all applicable penalties and corrective actions.

I am attaching the VEC decision and supporting documentation, including emails, payroll records, and correspondence. Please give these matters prompt and thorough review. I am available to provide further information or clarification as needed.