UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

NORFOLK AREA OFFICE – MID-ATLANTIC REGION

IN THE MATTER OF:
Thomas D. Coates, Complainant
v.
Cox Communications, Inc., Respondent
EEOC Charge No.: 12K-2025-00001
DOJ ADA Complaint No.: 536785-LFD  |  DOL WHD Matter: [Pending]
Date: June 11, 2025
To: Mrs. Elizabeth Rader, District Director, Charlotte District Office
Cc: Ms. Veronica Chaney, District Director’s Secretary
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
129 W. Trade Street, Ste. 400
Charlotte, NC 28202
veronica.chaney@eeoc.gov
There are moments when the record itself becomes the argument—when facts, once gathered and aligned, reveal a pattern so persistent and disregard so systematic that the only possible response is to acknowledge the harm and demand remedy. This is such a moment. What follows is not simply a collection of exhibits or grievances, but the beginning of a reckoning—a record that, once assembled, will not permit indifference or ambiguity. The evidence here is not only cumulative; it is catalytic. It exposes a reality that has persisted for years, a reality that could have been mitigated at countless junctures had those entrusted with authority chosen to act. The time for equivocation has passed. The time for accountability has arrived.

I submit this cover letter with humility and respect for the process, fully aware that no single document can capture the weight of lived experience or the impact of institutional neglect. Yet, it is my hope that what follows will serve as both a record and a call to conscience—a demonstration that, even when procedures falter, the truth can and will be brought to bear. This letter precedes a comprehensive legal submission with multiple attachments and exhibits. The accompanying main document presents a full evidentiary record and detailed legal argument, organized for immediate review by the EEOC, cross-agency partners, and potential legal and advocacy representatives.

VEC Appeal Win Proves Cox’s Assertions Are False:
The Virginia Employment Commission, after reviewing the evidence, reversed the denial of my benefits on appeal—finding medical separation, not voluntary resignation. For the VEC to rule in my favor, Cox’s core assertions must be false.
HEADLINED FACTS DEMONSTRATING URGENCY AND JURISDICTION

The evidence and documentation provided are not simply procedural—they are deeply personal. They reflect years of perseverance, repeated attempts to seek redress through every available channel, and the lived consequences of institutional inaction. This submission is designed to make the scope and seriousness of these violations unmistakable, and to ensure that every reviewer—whether legal, regulatory, or public—can see not only the harm but the imperative for remedy.

Each exhibit is referenced in the main body and indexed for immediate review. The cumulative effect is not only to prove the violations but to make denial impossible. This is a record designed to command attention, demand justice, and withstand scrutiny from any forum—legal, regulatory, or public.

With respect and hope,
/s/ Thomas D. Coates
Thomas D. Coates
tdcoates@gmail.com | (757) 374-3539
Dated: June 11, 2025
Attachments:
(See main document for full exhibit list and supporting materials)
Cross-Agency Notification:
This matter has been formally noticed to the following agencies and organizations: